Keji Mao

Since mid-2024, tentative signs of a warming in China-India relations have been upended again by external shocks, including the US President Donald Trump’s chaotic ‘reciprocal tariffs’ launched in early April 2025 and a terrorist attack in India’s Kashmir. These events have plunged the bilateral relationship into a state of uncertainty.

Amid this delicate thawing, India’s commerce and industry minister, Piyush Goyal, declared on April 11 that allowing China into the World Trade Organisation (WTO) was the root cause of today’s global trade crisis, while praising Trump’s tariffs as necessary and beneficial to the world, presenting a golden opportunity for India.

The subtext of Goyal’s remarks carries far greater weight than their surface meaning. For many in China, his words crystallise a bitter realisation: Indian decision-makers only entertain improving ties with Beijing during fleeting moments of vulnerability, such as after the floundering US visit in February 2025. The moment Trump decides to go after China, India reflexively aligns with Washington’s hawkish stance.

India’s approach to China, prone to sharp swings with shifting external winds, lays bare the fragility of China-India relations. This vulnerability stems from two sources. Externally, India’s posture hinges on the state of US-China relations: only when Washington and Beijing are on stable footing does New Delhi pursue warmer ties with China. Internally, domestic pressures can swiftly derail progress. Any spark that ignites public resentment toward China—whether Beijing is implicated or not—can sabotage bilateral relations.

More fundamentally, India’s ambivalence signals a failure to fully comprehend why amicable China-India relations benefit not only China but, more critically, India itself—especially its aspirations for development and global ascendancy.

China’s Lesson: Always Prioritize Development When Possible

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been dubbed ‘India’s Deng Xiaoping,’ but equating the two based solely on Modi’s pro-business reforms overlooks the depth of Deng’s legacy. Many in India fail to appreciate that Deng, the mastermind of China’s reform and opening up, not only drove domestic transformation but also made a prescient assessment of the global geopolitical landscape: the defining themes of the era were peace and development, not revolution and war.

This insight shaped nearly ev