R.C. Sharma

The Radcliffe award, bifurcating India and Pakistan into two nations was an adversarial award executed without any application of mind, sowing seeds of discord between people at the very stage of inception. The euphoria over the birth of Bangladesh was also short-lived. The perception that the birth of Bangladesh would stabilise borders proved a myth. Bangladesh instead of acting as a stabiliser acted more as a destabiliser owing to its internal instability coupled with large-scale illegal migration affecting its demographic profile. The Indo-Bhutan and Indo-Nepal borders are considered soft borders; however, the regimen of border security takes no time in turning soft borders into adversarial ones when national interests clash. The Indo-Myanmar border is a live example of how overnight, soft borders turn into hard and hostile borders.

Borders require inclusive structured border management integrating all stakeholders to ensure effective border security. Border management is an unstructured domain where only border security is a centralised structured security domain. It is unstructured considering the unorganised community and local government participation in border management. There is a need to create a structured organisational model for community and local government participation in border management, to make them active and not reactive players. Thus, border management consists of three main stakeholders: border guarding force, border population and local administration. Like adversarial relations between counterparts on either side of a border, relations between stakeholders generally remain aloof and contentious due to conflict between local and border security needs. The adversarial relationship makes the task of border guarding forces difficult and hostile, affecting border security. Contentious stakeholder relationships coupled with hostile neighbours keeping a hawk’s eye over the nation’s vast borders, there is an urgent need for a documented border security strategy for impregnable border security. India has 15,106.7 kilometres of land border and a coastline of 7,516.6 kilometres.  In a clockwise circle, it is Pakistan to the west, Afghanistan to the north, China to the north and north east, Nepal and Bhutan to the north, Bangladesh and Myanmar to the east.

What should be the border security strategy and paradigm to address border security threats? Should it be a common template for all borders or different templates for different borders? Professionally, there cannot be one template to fit all borders to address border security threats. Borders need addressing as per threat assessment. Threat assessment indicates how border management and defence need to tread on that particular border. Therefore, not all borders can be tarred with the same brush. There have to be different templates for different borders. These