R.C. Sharma

The role of the Border Security Force (BSF) comes from the BSF Act 1968. The war role is holding of ground in less threatened sectors so long as main attack does not develop in a particular sector and situation is within the capability of the BSF to deal with and extension of flanks.

There is limited aggressive action against paramilitary and special tasks connected with intelligence and acting as guides. In addition, secondary wartime role is to maintain law and order in captured enemy territory, provision of escorts and guarding of prisoner of war cages. The BSF also controls influx of refugees and carries out anti-infiltration duties.

Within six years of raising, the BSF through battle-hardened training, determination and grit, carved a niche for itself in the history of 1971 war and emerged as first line of defence. The moot question is how and why its war role was obviated from the radar of ministry of home affairs (MHA) and the BSF headquarters’ operations directorate.

The victory of 1971 war brought laurels to the BSF. Thereafter, a period of recognition, euphoria and felicitations started which continued for quite some time. War training, including exercises and integration with army continued for some time though later a sense of complacency set in. The lessons of 1971 war were slowly forgotten. However, the BSF continued with emphasis on war training, courtesy strong and dynamic leadership provided by K.F. Rustamji and Ashwani Kumar. Their dynamism and strong leadership ensured effective training for defined roles well into the late Seventies. Thereafter, war training was diluted and physical integration with army took the backseat but did not completely disappear.

The leadership which came thereafter lacked dynamism. It had no connect with the BSF and was foreign to force ethos and culture. Barring a few police officers who served in the BSF as DIGs, all others para-dropped at the top. They believed that the BSF was a slightly better-equipped version of the police; its primary roles being border guarding and fighting terrorism.

Since in late Seventies and early Eighties, terrorism had engulfed Punjab, aided and abetted from across the border, the BSF was required to focus on rudimentary guarding of borders and fighting terrorism. Its wartime role slipped off the radar. It is still missing. War training is a non-priority for the BSF hierarchy at all levels of leadership, which is responsible for propounding and implementing operational doctrine. In fact, the BSF has no such doctrine. Hence, the training directive is issued without the doctrine. Consequently, the war time role has been slowly and collectively relegated to the background by the MHA, Indian Police Service and recalcitrant cadre leadership.

Defunct Training Directorate: Organisations need to keep their personnel oriented to their role and task through continuous motivation. This can be done  through war history and training. However, both components are not there in the BSF during basic as well as in-service training. There is no practical training and concept of offensive defence is missin