How viral online content subconsciously implants and normalises radical ideologies
Antara Jha
In the digital age, memes have transcended their role as simple humorous images and text overlays. They have become potent instruments of influence, shaping opinions, normalising behaviours, and even radicalising individuals. What once started as harmless light-hearted internet humour has, over time, evolved into a sophisticated tool used by various entities to push ideological narratives, promote extremist views, and justify immoral actions. This article examines the psychological architecture behind meme culture, analysing how seemingly innocuous humour serves as a vehicle for introducing and normalising radical thoughts and actions.
The power of memes lies in their accessibility, shareability, and the way they package complex ideas into digestible, emotionally resonant content. Their viral nature ensures widespread distribution, often bypassing traditional critical thinking processes through humour and relatability. This creates a perfect storm for ideological infiltration that operates beneath conscious awareness—a phenomenon with profound implications for society, digital citizenship, and individual psychological well-being.
Psychological Mechanisms
Humour serves as the perfect delivery system for ideological content precisely because it disarms our critical faculties. Memes operate on a psychological level by engaging cognitive biases and subconscious processing. When we laugh, our psychological defences lower, creating what researchers call the ‘persuasion knowledge gap’—a period during which we process information with less scrutiny. The brain is wired to absorb and retain information presented in a humorous format, making it easier to remember and accept over time. This phenomenon is known as the mere-exposure effect, where repeated exposure to an idea, even in jest, increases its acceptance. Psychologically, this occurs because humour activates reward centres in the brain, releasing dopamine and creating positive associations with the content being consumed.
Memes rely on the peripheral route of persuasion, which influences people without engaging their critical thinking faculties. Unlike direct propaganda, which often faces resistance, memes bypass scepticism by embedding controversial ideas within humour, sarcasm, and satire. This phenomenon becomes particularly potent when controversial or extreme ideas are packaged as jokes. The recipient can simultaneously absorb the ideological message while maintaining plausible deniability through the shield of ‘it’s just a joke.’ This creates cognitive dissonance where individuals may find themselves laughing at content that contradicts their stated values, gradually shifting their perception of what’s acceptable.
The Dark Side
The use of humour as a Trojan horse is not a new concept. Historically, satire and dark humour were tools used to challenge oppressive systems and question authority. However, in contemporary digital culture, humour is being weaponized to insult, defame, and dehumanise individuals and groups. What begins as a chuckle can erode moral boundaries, paving the way for acceptance of radical beliefs or actions.
Content creators and influencers, under the guise of ‘dark humour’ and ‘dank comedy’, are producing material that openly mocks personal beliefs, cultural identities, and even victims of heinous crimes. While humour was once intended to critique conventional thinking, today it is often used to normalise abusive behaviour and even justify extreme violence.
From Jest to Justification
Disturbingly, this mechanism has been exploited to justify immoral and even criminal acts. Memes glorifying physical or sexual attacks often masquerade as ‘edgy’ humour, trivialising the gravity of such behaviours. For instance, content that mocks victims of violence—sometimes targeting specific groups based on region, religion, language, or gender—can foster a culture where aggression is seen as a punchline rather than a tragedy.
The psychological principle known as the ‘mere exposure effect’ demonstrates that repeated exposure to a stimulus increases our preference for it, regardless of its content. In the context of memes, constant exposure to radical ideas, even in jest, creates familiarity that eventually translates to acceptance.
Many memes and viral content subtly promote and justify heinous acts, including physical and sexual attacks. By trivialising these actions, they contribute to a culture of desensitisation, making individuals less likely to perceive such acts as serious offenses. Some content actively encourages misogyny/ misandry, racism, and xenophobia, presenting them as mere ‘opinions’ wrapped in humour.
Research in cognitive psychology reveals that repeated exposure reduces the psychological discomfort associated with controversial ideas. What initially shocks eventually becomes normalised through repetition. Memes exploit this mechanism by repackaging similar ideological content in slightly different formats, ensuring continued engagement while solidifying the underlying message.
The Nightmare for Victims
By repeatedly framing heinous acts as comedic, these memes erode empathy, emboldening those who might act on such impulses while numbing bystanders to the suffering involved.
Content creators, often shielded by the anonymity of the internet, contribute to this trend. Under the guise of ‘dark humour’ or ‘dank comedy’, some produce material that insults individuals or derogates personal beliefs. While the intent may be framed as satire, the impact on victims is profound—feelings of humiliation, helplessness, and violation linger long after the laughter fades. Worse still, the permanence of digital content exacerbates this harm. Once uploaded, such material cannot be fully erased from online platforms, leaving victims to grapple with a perpetual echo of their pain. Imagine the psychological toll on someone whose trauma is immortalised in a viral meme—available for all to see, comment on, and share indefinitely.
You must be logged in to view this content.