Not a Place for Women

Col Yogander Singh

Women are nurturers by nature, and not meant for combat

Women in the Indian military seem to be a settled issue. After all, they have been there since ages. First recruited as nurses during World War I, their role expanded to Auxiliary Corps raised in 1942 during World War II and now Indian military has more than 11,500 females serving in three services. However, their internal distribution is skewed. For example, according to the 17 March 2023 Press Information Bureau (PIB) report, out of 7,050 females in the army, 6,993 were in officer rank and less than 100 belonged to Personnel Below Officer Rank (PBOR). This smells like wokeism!

Before going any further, let me share my firm belief that:

• No religion bans females from the profession of arms, but all religions expect the woman to be a nurturer and family-maker first.
• History is replete with the examples of women displaying utmost courage and fighting spirit under most trying circumstances. Thus, there should be no doubt about their moral and physical courage.

Caveats

Admiration for the female courage and resilience and religious neutrality cannot be used to gloss over certain well-established caveats, which makes women second best choice for the army and navy in entirety and as combat aircraft pilots in the air force.

Physical differences: Across the animal kingdom, on average male have bigger bodies and greater stamina. This is true of humans as well and is reflected in different performance yardsticks for the male and female athletes. It is even more pronounced in the case of military. In a paper titled, ‘What Kind Of Nation Sends Women Into Combat?’, former staff member on the Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces of USA in early Nineties, R. Cort Kirkwood wrote, ‘As a practical matter, 99 percent of women are unsuited for combat, and that includes flying combat aircraft and serving on combatant ships. That women do these things doesn’t mean they should; it just means the military has been feminised and civilianised.’

Many also argue that women lack the necessary physical strength. That the maximum feminine strength is as good as the physically weakest man. When the military doesn’t accept physically weak men, isn’t it strange that it accepts women, no matter how strong they may be. Moreover, statistics suggest that women suffer from higher rates of bone fractures. Combined with other physiological aspects, such as menstruation and pregnancy, the combating period of a woman would be much lower than a man. And since they cannot survive the same basic training as men, the training must be ‘gender-sensitised’. This fact was reflected in different minimum physical standards prescribed for an officer cadet when joining the Officer Training Academy (OTA), Chennai.

Psychological differences: A famous book on man-woman issues was titled ‘Women are from Venus and Man from the Mars’. Nature had to make two as one couldn’t be given all the desired qualities. For example, when communicating the women prefer to talk face-to-face while the men do so side-by-side. It is so because women bring up ch