Ghazala Wahab

Two recent judgements by lower courts, which usually take maximalist positions on the side of caution, suggest that the government of India may want to dial down provocation in the Kashmir Valley. At least for now.

One, a Delhi court recently awarded Kashmiri separatist and former militant Yasin Malik multiple life sentences and financial penalty of Rs 10 lakh in a case of terror funding. The National Investigative Agency had pleaded for a death sentence. The 56-year-old Malik may yet get a death sentence in another case—killing of unarmed IAF personnel waiting to board a bus in 1990. The chargesheet for this case was filed only in 2020, even though the case was registered in 1990 itself. There were reasons for this delay, but more on that later. As of now, it seems improbable that the judgement on that case will come in a hurry. Malik is likely to remain alive, at least until the time his death is deemed more useful to the government.

Two, People’s Democratic Party’s (PDP) youth leader and former chief minister Mehbooba Mufti’s confidante Waheed Parra was granted bail by the Jammu and Kashmir high court after 18 months of incarceration. The court deemed evidence against him too sketchy. That neither his arrest nor his bail has anything to do with the merits of the charges against him is evident from the fact that even when Parra had managed to secure the bail within two months of his arrest on 25 November 2020 (he got the bail in January 2021), he was immediately arrested by another agency. Clearly, someone had decided that he, or what he represented, needed to be taught a lesson. Hence, treated like a cri