Ghazala Wahab

Two compulsions and one assumption steered the government towards the Agnipath recruitment scheme. The compulsions first.

In 2013, once Narendra Modi was declared Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) prime ministerial candidate, he addressed an ex-servicemen rally in Rewari accompanied by the former army chief and by then a BJP politician, Gen. V.K. Singh. He assured the exultant crowd that once he came to power, he would favourably resolve the One Rank One Pension (OROP) issue that had been exercising the armed forces personnel. Thereafter, the BJP election manifesto promised implementation of OROP.

The problem with the promise was that the scheme made no economic sense. That was the reason the previous government, despite repeated assurances, could not implement it. In a move to placate the protesting ex-servicemen, the UPA government did increase the old pensions in a manner that the gap between them and the current was significantly reduced. But it refused to equalise the pensions in perpetuity, between, say, a colonel who retired in 1990 and the one who retired in 2010. The logic was that a person’s pension depended upon the salary he/ she drew upon retirement and not what that salary would be 20 years later.

But once the BJP chose populism over logic, it had to fulfil its promise, which it did in November 2015. Sure enough, defence allocations shot through the roof. A brief pause, to understand the nuances of the defence budget. The defence budget is divided between the revenue and the capital. The revenue is for pay and pensions; and the capital is for the purchase of defence equipment, basically modernisation of the forces. Even before the implementation of the OROP, the ratio between the revenue and the capital allocations was skewed in favour of the former.

However, with the OROP imposing a recurring expenditure of nearly Rs 7,123 crore every year, the total spending on pay and pensions crossed 70 per cent of the total spending on defence, leaving even less money for buying new equipment. Worse, the remaining 30 per cent is not available for buying new stuff alone. It also has to cater for instalments on the already bought weapon platforms. Now, if the economy was growing at 10 per cent, as once we thought it would, this expenditure wouldn’t have hurt so much. But given the way things are and are likely to be in the foreseeable future, claims of USD 5 trillion economy notwithstanding, it is impossible for the government to meet this expenditure.

In 2019, former military advisor to the National Security Advisor Shiv Shankar Menon, Lt Gen. Prakash Menon and deputy director of Takshila Institution Pranay Kotasthane wrote a paper on ‘A Human Capital Investment Model for India’s National Security System’ in which they proposed several measures to contain the growing burden of defence pensions. Though not officially accepted, the Agnipath scheme is loosely based on their tour of duty (ToD) model. One major difference is that while ToD included officer cadre as well, the Agnipath is limited to jawans.

So, anyone who says that Agnipath is about reforms is either ignorant or a liar. It is only about money. Simply put, we don’t have any. A testimony to this is the carcasses of innumerable procurement programmes which the ministry of defence has been stalling for years on some pretext or the other. All kinds of theoretical changes in the procurement procedure have happened, including renaming—from defence procurement procedure (DPP) to defence acquisition