The Indian Story
The global war on terrorism is still to reach Kashmir
By Ghazala Wahab
Along with shock and anguish, there was hope in the Indian establishment after the September 11 attacks. It was felt that now that terrorism had hit home at the very citadel of American prosperity, the US would appreciate India’s position vis a vis Pakistan (which had been exporting terrorism not only in Kashmir but in other parts of India) better. Unfortunately, expediency dictated that the US understands Pakistan’s position first as it launched the global war on terrorism (GWOT) with the support of the international community. Pakistan was its executing partner. India had to remain content with the assurance that in the second phase of the GWOT India’s concerns would be addressed. However, not just India, but the world in general, is still waiting for the second phase to begin. Unfortunately, the US has got a bit distracted with problems in Iraq and now probably Iran. If at all there was any doubt, then the US president made the extra effort in his inaugural address to remove them by making it clear that the much-publicised GWOT has turned into a US war. And obviously there is no room in that for Indian concerns just yet.

Yet, it would be incorrect to say that 9/11 and the subsequent war in Afghanistan did not have any impact on militancy/terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir. A Kashmiri government official says that to begin with, international pressure on India ceased. Moreover, the US put pressure on Pakistan that it has to stop cross-border terrorism. Meanwhile, Pakistan President also changed his tune: from supporting jihad in Kashmir, he claimed to be supporting only ‘morally and principally’ the indigenous freedom struggle. Ironically, the immediate impact on ground in Kashmir was increased violence. Just a month after the attack in the US, terrorists attacked the Jammu and Kashmir assembly on 1 October 2001. On December 13, they followed it up with an attack on Indian Parliament in New Delhi, which enraged India enough to launch Operation Parakaram, ostensibly to give Pakistan a taste of its own medicine. Encouraged by the US war in Afghanistan, the initial thinking was that India should do to Pakistan what the US was doing in Afghanistan. Both were just wars. Unfortunately, India missed one small detail. Pakistan was orchestrating the US war in Afghanistan, its troops were doing the dirty work for the US; hence, there was no way the US would have allowed India to do anything against Pakistan at that moment. For appearances’ sake, Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf went on the national network to condemn terrorism of all hues and shades and swore that he would not allow his territory to be used by acts of terror. The purpose was two-fold: to tell his domestic audience that the reversal of Pakistan’s policies in Afghanistan was a pragmatic and a necessary step and also to impress upon the US that he is doing his best not to provoke India into a war. If India persists with the mobilisation of its troops then it would be the aggressor, which may jeopardise the US war.

Sure enough, the sum total of the 10-month-long mobilisation was the assembly elections in J&K in October 2002, which brought the People’s Democratic Party-Congress alliance to power. Despite the fact that the Indian forces were mobilised for war all along the Line of Control in J&K, the casualties in terrorist violence in 2002 were quite high. There were more concerted and coordinated attacks on security personnel and their family members as well. Officially, the figure of deaths was 1,000 civilians and 400 security personnel. But 2002 may have been a freak year because of the assembly elections as the level of violence reduced in the following years.
Comments(0) Share
[View Full Story]
  © 2012 FORCE ARROWHEAD MEDIA PVT. LTD. All Rights Reserved.